Test::Fatal(3) User Contributed Perl Documentation Test::Fatal(3)NAMETest::Fatal - incredibly simple helpers for testing code with
exceptions
VERSION
version 0.010
SYNOPSIS
use Test::More;
use Test::Fatal;
use System::Under::Test qw(might_die);
is(
exception { might_die; },
undef,
"the code lived",
);
like(
exception { might_die; },
qr/turns out it died/,
"the code died as expected",
);
isa_ok(
exception { might_die; },
'Exception::Whatever',
'the thrown exception',
);
DESCRIPTIONTest::Fatal is an alternative to the popular Test::Exception. It does
much less, but should allow greater flexibility in testing exception-
throwing code with about the same amount of typing.
It exports one routine by default: "exception".
FUNCTIONS
exception
my $exception = exception { ... };
"exception" takes a bare block of code and returns the exception thrown
by that block. If no exception was thrown, it returns undef.
Achtung! If the block results in a false exception, such as 0 or the
empty string, Test::Fatal itself will die. Since either of these cases
indicates a serious problem with the system under testing, this
behavior is considered a feature. If you must test for these
conditions, you should use Try::Tiny's try/catch mechanism. (Try::Tiny
is the underlying exception handling system of Test::Fatal.)
Note that there is no TAP assert being performed. In other words, no
"ok" or "not ok" line is emitted. It's up to you to use the rest of
"exception" in an existing test like "ok", "isa_ok", "is", et cetera.
Or you may wish to use the "dies_ok" and "lives_ok" wrappers, which do
provide TAP output.
"exception" does not alter the stack presented to the called block,
meaning that if the exception returned has a stack trace, it will
include some frames between the code calling "exception" and the thing
throwing the exception. This is considered a feature because it avoids
the occasionally twitchy "Sub::Uplevel" mechanism.
Achtung! This is not a great idea:
like( exception { ... }, qr/foo/, "foo appears in the exception" );
If the code in the "..." is going to throw a stack trace with the
arguments to each subroutine in its call stack, the test name, "foo
appears in the exception" will itself be matched by the regex.
Instead, write this:
my $exception = exception { ... };
like( $exception, qr/foo/, "foo appears in the exception" );
Achtung: One final bad idea:
isnt( exception { ... }, undef, "my code died!");
It's true that this tests that your code died, but you should really
test that it died for the right reason. For example, if you make an
unrelated mistake in the block, like using the wrong dereference, your
test will pass even though the code to be tested isn't really run at
all. If you're expecting an inspectable exception with an identifier
or class, test that. If you're expecting a string exception, consider
using "like".
success
try {
should_live;
} catch {
fail("boo, we died");
} success {
pass("hooray, we lived");
};
"success", exported only by request, is a Try::Tiny helper with
semantics identical to "finally", but the body of the block will only
be run if the "try" block ran without error.
Although almost any needed exception tests can be performed with
"exception", success blocks may sometimes help organize complex
testing.
dies_ok
lives_ok
Exported only by request, these two functions run a given block of
code, and provide TAP output indicating if it did, or did not throw an
exception. These provide an easy upgrade path for replacing existing
unit tests based on "Test::Exception".
RJBS does not suggest using this except as a convenience while porting
tests to use Test::Fatal's "exception" routine.
use Test::More tests => 2;
use Test::Fatal qw(dies_ok lives_ok);
dies_ok { die "I failed" } 'code that fails';
lives_ok { return "I'm still alive" } 'code that does not fail';
AUTHOR
Ricardo Signes <rjbs@cpan.org>
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
This software is copyright (c) 2010 by Ricardo Signes.
This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
the same terms as the Perl 5 programming language system itself.
perl v5.16.2 2012-02-16 Test::Fatal(3)
